Topic: Science & Technology Diet Wars: The Wall Street Journal, PCRM, PETA, and the Atkins Attack (2/11/2004)
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals make some good and important arguments now and then, but like all true believers, they are prone to trampling on others in their zeal to change the world. Now it has spear-headed the media mugging of a dead doctor, Robert Atkins of Atkins Diet fame, for the crime of advocating a protein rich diet that eschews carbohydrates while encouraging the ingestion of meat. A “medical group” known as The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) received the late Dr. Atkins medical records “by mistake” (hmmmmÂ…) and sent them to the Wall Street Journal, which dutifully revealed that before the doctor’s death, he had suffered a heart attack, congestive heart failure and hypertension, and noted that at 258 pounds and six feet tall, the diet guru qualified as “obese.” How unethical is all this? Let us count the ways:
PCRM presented its information under false pretenses. The medical records, even if not obtained illicitly, should not have been given to the press. If the people making up PCRM are indeed physicians, they should have appreciated and respected the confidential nature of such records.
Okay, the Atkins people have their biases too; at this point we don’t know what the truth is, and whether Dr. Atkins may have suffered some adverse effects from his own diet. We do know that private information was obtained by an axe-grinding advocacy group that shielded their identity behind a captive quasi-medical organization. We do know that it was given to the press, when it shouldn’t have been, and printed, with inadequate research into what it meant and the circumstances surrounding it. And we do know that a man, his name, reputation and legacy have been meanly smeared, without sufficient cause. If the Atkins Diet is unhealthy, the PETA folks and their doctor familiars are free to prove it. What Dr, Atkins himself weighed and how he died proves nothing. The actions of PETA were calculated to cause harm, on the ethically indefensible theory that discrediting the founder of the Atkins Diet would save a cow or two. PETA can accomplish its goals without deception, without character assassination, without invading people’s privacy, and without distorting the facts. If it can’t, then it should go out of existence.
|
© 2007 Jack Marshall & ProEthics,
Ltd |