| March 2009 Unethical Websites
Unlike most of the Scoreboard’s Unethical
Website designees, the exact ethical offense of myfreeimplants.com
is difficult to define. The site is not illegal. It actually facilitates
charity, though a particularly perverse form of charity. The site, on
rare occasions, may even help someone who is emotionally and psychologically
damaged to achieve new self-esteem. How does one describe what
is wrong with a website that makes it possible for men to buy breast
implants for women they have never met, and then encourages them to
drool over the results? Might one say, perhaps, that by combining the
shallowest romantic impulses of men with the culturally-induced insecurities
of women, it achieves a sort of perfect storm of degradation---women
allowing themselves to be manipulated by strange men into becoming their
custom-designed masturbatory fantasies, and men allowing themselves
to be exploited by women willing to trade their dignity to get some
lonely suckers to pay for a new pair of Double-D silicon hooters? Even that fails to capture
the pure, nauseating, sad, depressing sordidness of it all. Maybe it is best to let the site speak for itself. Here’s how “myfreeimplants” works. Women who “have a strong desire to enhance their physical appearance through cosmetic surgery” post photos of themselves on the site along with profiles and comments. Then men whom the site amusingly calls “benefactors” (it is shorter than “lonely, horny guys who want to build their own personal pin-up girls rather than paying money to the same old porn sites”) have “unrestricted access to all of the female profiles” and “can also help the ladies” by:
“And remember...” the site reminds its benefactors, “the best part is seeing the newly transformed ladies after the surgery when they return to the website to post pictures of the results. You can take pride in knowing that you helped her improve her self esteem and self image!” Yeah, I’m sure that’s what
the “benefactors” are interested in doing…improving female self-esteem. Nobody using the site is doing
anything wrong, exactly. Men are paying money to feel like Pygmalion;
women get free implants so they can look like Pamela Anderson, at least
between their neck and ribcage. They are all consenting adults. Men
can spend their money the way they want; it’s better than buying a
lottery ticket, I suppose. Women can do what they want to their bodies.
And if women make men spend their money stupidly, and men make women
disfigure themselves in return, well, what happens on this website is
a just a microcosm of the male-female relationship throughout civilization. Still, the site feels wrong.
Ethical values are guides to living in society that human beings have
developed, learned and embraced over time. The values work, and have
worked for centuries. Any time activities that challenge these values
become commonplace and acceptable, there is a real chance that life
for all of us will be diminished, and that our enjoyment of it will
be less. I don’t relish the prospect of living in a society where
men use the power of money to surgically alter women they have never
met, just to realize their juvenile fantasies. I don’t want to live
in a society where women believe that the size of their breasts will
determine their human worth, and are willing to humiliate themselves
on the web to get themselves “enhanced.” The website may be contributing
to the development of such a society. It may also simply be addressing
the needs of a society that already exists. Women would not become topless
pole dancers if men didn’t pay to watch them. Are topless bars unethical?
There are dozens of commercial relationships in America where men and
women exploit and profit from each other’s weaknesses without coercion
or misrepresentation. Perhaps Myfreeimplants.com isn’t unethical at
all, but just a natural progression in the acceptance and rejection
of values that is part of the ongoing evolution of civilization. I can’t stop thinking of
Leah Thompson’s performance as the alternate-reality version of Marty
McFly’s mother in “Back to the Future II,” her pumped-up breasts
symbolizing her complete corruption and domination by the villainous
“Biff.” That alternate reality would include myfreeimplants.
Maybe my gut feeling that the site is unethical is just the “yuck
factor” at work. As discussed elsewhere on the Scoreboard, the yuck
factor comes into play when something is new and jolting, but a fair
and dispassionate ethical analysis will reveal the new development to
be well within acceptable ethical margins. A BBC documentary about the
website was entitled, “A Hundred Men Own My Breasts.” Yuck!
But is it wrong? When society begins embracing
destructive, unhealthy, selfish and offensive behavior and attitudes,
we can choose several paths. We can try to minimize the damage, resist
the decay. We can oppose the trend by protesting or condemning it. We
can quietly try to set better standards with our own conduct. We also
can endorse the new behavior by engaging in it. Finally, we can try
to exploit the problem, and profit by making it worse, supporting it,
and celebrating it. For example, we can try to
maintain civilized conduct in public by being polite and civil, dressing
neatly, bathing, and being respectful to strangers. On the other hand,
we can become shock-jocks on the radio, sell T-Shirts that have “Fuck
You!” printed on them. Or we can become lawyers, and collect legal
fees on behalf of clients filing lawsuits to keep airlines from kicking
passengers off who are dressed in bikinis or who smell like goats. We
can oppose the spread of drugs in the schools, or, in the alternative,
we can sell bongs for a living, or get laughs by ridiculing parents
who support anti-drug measures on TV, like Bill Maher. We can try to
explain to children why cheating in school is wrong, or we can run a
website that provides custom-written essays to students for a fee. All
of the exploitive choices lend themselves to the same defense---I’m
just giving people what they want--- and the same rationalization---If
I didn’t do it, someone else would---and both are undoubtedly
true. Both also miss the point of
ethical conduct, which is ultimately to create a better world. I am
well aware of the counter-argument to this, which is the assertion that
others have the right to pursue their own ideas of a better world, even
if it is Hefnerworld, where all women wear EE push-up bras, where men
can happily and guiltlessly exploit women’s insecurities to control
them, and women exercise their personal freedom by turning themselves
into walking, talking Barbie dolls. But I don’t believe for a second
that anyone really has that objective. The objective of the owners of
myfreeimplants.com, I am sufficiently certain, is to facilitate unhealthy
attitudes and destructive conduct that they know exist, and to profit
from them. They don’t care about society, values, or the world. They
care about themselves. Ideally, everyone in our society
would recognize an obligation to try to make it better…fairer, kinder,
more just, more civil, kind, and humane. It is unreasonable to maintain
that anything short of altruism is unethical, but it is not unduly
burdensome to hold that an ethical member of society must at least avoid
conduct calculated to make society worse. I believe myfreeimplants reinforces
conduct and attitudes that degrades both men and women, and by that
standard, it is unethical. And also: Yuck!
|
||||
|
© 2007 Jack Marshall & ProEthics,
Ltd |