| David Manning Trivial Liars of the Month for October 2005
There is now officially competition for the most transparently disingenuous
expression of outrage in American cultural history. The long-time champion,
film buffs know, has been Claude Rains' wonderfully corrupt Captain Renaud
in "Casablanca," whose statement "I am shocked…shocked!..that gambling
is going on in this establishment!" is immediately undercut by an employee's
courtly "Your winnings, Captain!" to which Renaud replies, "Thank you
very much!" This is a tough act to top, but Anheuser-Busch has submitted
a serious contender for the title, good enough to make it the David Manning
Trivial Liar of this month, or any other month. The company has been using a game called "Beer Pong" (dubbed "Bud
Pong" in the Anheuser-Busch version) in its national marketing strategy.
It is a drinking game, and one that has become suddenly popular in bars
near college campuses. There are even special tables manufactured for
the game, which isn't exactly chess. Two teams line up on either end of
a long table and set up paper cups full of, uh, "liquid." When one team
successfully tosses a ball in one of the other team's cups, the other
team has to drink the, uh, "liquid" in the cup and remove it. Fun ensues.
The last team with cups left wins. As a story in the New York Times this week explained, Anheuser-Busch
had developed Bud Pong kits and sent them to beer wholesalers across the
country. The "guidelines" the nation's largest BEER maker included in
the kits specified that the DRINKING game called BUD Pong, which is played
in BARS, should be played by using cups filled with… water. This, of course, is like the makers of Q-Tips including instructions
that say one should never stick their product in one's ear. (They do,
you know!) And similarly motivated: it is a lawyer-dictated wink and nudge
to the consumer, who knows well what the real purpose of the product is.
But in case some over-enthusiastic Q-Tip user punctures his eardrum or
a Bud Pong loser crashes his Mini Cooper in a drunken stupor, the company's
obviously phony instructions provide a some legal defense. Nonetheless, the Q-Tips people have never had the brass to release a
press release expressing surprise that individuals were actually using
their product to ream out their ears. However, once the New York Times story exposed Anheuser-Busch's
efforts to encourage beer consumption via the drinking game route, the
company decided to take the safe and responsible route and stop promoting
Bud Pong. But it couldn't bring itself to do so by admitting that it
was a bad idea and accepting responsibility. Instead, it had spokeswoman
Francine I. Katz release a statement saying "It has come to our attention
that despite our explicit guidelines, there may have been instances where
this promotion was not carried out in the manner it was intended." Or
as Captain Renaud would say, "I'm shocked…shocked!...that people playing
Bud Pong named after our beer called Budweiser and promoted by our beer
company actually drink beer while playing it!" There can't be one person anywhere who believes that the makers of Budweiser
actually distributed Bud Pong kits thinking that bar patrons would actually
play them using water. There can't be one person anywhere who doesn't
believe that the makers of Budweiser did this to sell more beer. Yet Anheuser-Busch,
knowing this would be the case, nonetheless persisted in saying otherwise. Sure, it's a defensive move in case some Bud Pong player comes to grief
in a beer-addled state and sues the company. But it's also a mind-bendingly
transparent lie that nobody will believe and nobody at the company itself
can be so naïve as to think anyone will believe. As such, it causes
real harm It causes real harm, like all transparent lies, because it destroys the
credibility of Anheuser-Busch and, by extension, corporations in general.
After all, if they'll lie about something so obvious, what else are they
lying about? After whoppers like this, "everything" isn't an unreasonable
answer. On one level, Anheuser-Busch's transparently dishonest expression of
dismay is funny, just like the Captain's in Casablanca. But on another,
it is a cause for dismay itself. It shows a large consumer company with
little respect for its consumers or the public, willing to foster cynicism
and distrust to defuse potential legal liability of its own making. A
beer company trying to make us believe that it promoted drinking games
designed for water-drinkers is funny, but what it says about Anheuser-Busch
isn't funny at all.
|
||||
|
© 2004 Jack Marshall & ProEthics,
Ltd |